The ongoing conflict in Sudan continues to escalate, with serious allegations surfacing regarding the use of prohibited weaponry. The Civil Democratic Alliance Forces of Revolution (Taqaddum – صمود) is demanding an international investigation into claims that the Sudanese army has deployed chemical weapons during its fight against the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). This demand, coupled with the alliance’s stance on the war and its diplomatic efforts, forms the core of the current political landscape. This article delves into the details of these developments, exploring the accusations, the responses, and the alliance’s broader strategy for peace in Sudan.
دعوات للتحقيق الدولي في اتهامات استخدام الأسلحة الكيميائية (Calls for an International Investigation into Chemical Weapons Allegations)
The call for an international fact-finding committee stems from growing concerns about the methods employed in the Sudanese conflict. Jaafar Hassan, spokesperson for Taqaddum (صمود), stated the alliance’s readiness to hand over any member proven guilty to the International Criminal Court. Interestingly, Hassan pointed out that General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, head of the Sovereignty Council, himself initially called for an international investigation into these very accusations. This, according to صمود, makes the subsequent refusal to allow such an investigation all the more suspicious, suggesting a potential attempt to conceal evidence.
The alliance believes that rejecting a neutral, international inquiry raises serious questions about what parties are trying to hide. The use of الأسلحة الكيميائية (chemical weapons) would constitute a grave violation of international law and would necessitate a swift and thorough investigation.
رد فعل البرهان (Burhan’s Response)
General Burhan vehemently denied the allegations, dismissing them as unlikely to be believed by the Sudanese people. He challenged those making the claims to reveal the location of these alleged الأسلحة الكيميائية (chemical weapons) and where they were purportedly used. He warned that those spreading such rumors would face the wrath of the Sudanese people, emphasizing that the army belongs to the nation, not to him personally. This strong denial, however, hasn’t quelled the concerns raised by صمود and other observers.
موقف صمود من الحرب والجهات الفاعلة (Taqaddum’s Position on the War and the Actors Involved)
Taqaddum (صمود) firmly rejects accusations leveled by Sudanese Information Minister Khaled Al-Ayeser, who accused the alliance of treason, supporting the RSF, and inciting international opposition against Sudan. Hassan clarified that the alliance maintains a neutral stance, viewing the conflict as a binary situation: a camp of war and a camp of peace, with صمود firmly aligned with the latter.
The alliance’s primary goal is to achieve a cessation of hostilities and protect civilians. They condemn the actions of both sides, recognizing the suffering inflicted on the Sudanese population. This commitment to neutrality is a key aspect of their strategy for achieving a lasting peace. The الحرب في السودان (war in Sudan) has created a humanitarian crisis, and صمود is actively working to alleviate the suffering.
الجولة الأوروبية ومساعي السلام (The European Tour and Peace Efforts)
Taqaddum (صمود) recently concluded a European tour aimed at garnering support for ending the conflict. The primary objectives were to pressure European nations to push for a ceasefire, protect civilians, and expose the crimes committed by all parties involved. The tour proved successful, with Germany increasing its humanitarian aid to Sudan by 150 million euros immediately following the visit.
The alliance also defended its meeting with Ali Al-Haj, leader of the Popular Congress Party, explaining that the party has consistently opposed military coups, including the October 25th, 2021 coup and the current war. While acknowledging ideological differences, صمود emphasized their shared goal of ending the conflict.
شروط التعامل مع المؤتمر الوطني (Conditions for Dealing with the National Congress Party)
Regarding the relationship with the National Congress Party (NCP), صمود has laid out three strict conditions for any potential engagement:
- Disassociation from the army and cessation of its use.
- Dissolution of affiliated militias.
- A complete halt to calls for the continuation of the war.
Hassan stated that the NCP remains deeply entrenched within the military and civil service and continues to advocate for the prolongation of the conflict. This highlights the complexities of navigating the Sudanese political landscape and the challenges of achieving a comprehensive peace agreement.
افتتاح مطار الخرطوم والوضع الأمني (The Opening of Khartoum Airport and the Security Situation)
صمود criticized the reopening of Khartoum Airport without a prior political agreement to end the war, warning against exploiting this achievement for propaganda purposes at the expense of civilian lives. They questioned the complete security of Sudanese airspace, given the ongoing conflict and frequent aerial clashes. The alliance believes that a truly secure environment is essential before resuming normal operations. The الأمن في السودان (security in Sudan) remains precarious, and any steps towards normalization must prioritize the safety of civilians.
In conclusion, the situation in Sudan remains deeply volatile. Taqaddum (صمود) is playing a crucial role in advocating for peace, demanding accountability, and seeking international support. The call for an independent investigation into the alleged use of الأسلحة الكيميائية (chemical weapons) is a critical step towards uncovering the truth and ensuring justice for the victims of this devastating conflict. The alliance’s continued diplomatic efforts and its commitment to a neutral stance offer a glimmer of hope for a peaceful resolution to the crisis. Further updates and developments will be crucial to monitor as the situation unfolds.
